<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miley Cyrus Zuhair Murad Spring 2009 Dress A Ripoff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.superficialdiva.com/2009/0224/miley-cyrus-zuhair-murad-spring-2009-dress-a-ripoff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.superficialdiva.com/2009/0224/miley-cyrus-zuhair-murad-spring-2009-dress-a-ripoff/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:39:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina Korpi</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialdiva.com/2009/0224/miley-cyrus-zuhair-murad-spring-2009-dress-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-41453</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina Korpi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 04:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialdiva.com/?p=5562#comment-41453</guid>
		<description>I concur Gaston; the original Dior dress is far more fabulous than the dress worn by Miley in 2009.  Perhaps it is not illegal to copy a dress, but it does speak volumes about the integrity of the &#039;copycat&#039; dressmaker. I would have respect for Zuhair had he credited the design for this dress to Dior. Re-inventing an already existing design in a new way, while crediting the original designer, seems fine to me, but this is a blatant, ( and might I add &quot;very poor&quot; ), attempt to copy an original design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur Gaston; the original Dior dress is far more fabulous than the dress worn by Miley in 2009.  Perhaps it is not illegal to copy a dress, but it does speak volumes about the integrity of the &#8216;copycat&#8217; dressmaker. I would have respect for Zuhair had he credited the design for this dress to Dior. Re-inventing an already existing design in a new way, while crediting the original designer, seems fine to me, but this is a blatant, ( and might I add &#8220;very poor&#8221; ), attempt to copy an original design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaston</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialdiva.com/2009/0224/miley-cyrus-zuhair-murad-spring-2009-dress-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-11179</link>
		<dc:creator>gaston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialdiva.com/?p=5562#comment-11179</guid>
		<description>sinse fahion cant be copyrighted whatsoever because they dont consider it an actual art sense its clothing now they are some penalties Chambre de commerce et d&#039;industrie in paris but idkif this would cualify obiously not. but yeah its a very similar sort of replicate of this dress. but the second replicate does not even get close to the original dior which is simply a marvalous creation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sinse fahion cant be copyrighted whatsoever because they dont consider it an actual art sense its clothing now they are some penalties Chambre de commerce et d&#8217;industrie in paris but idkif this would cualify obiously not. but yeah its a very similar sort of replicate of this dress. but the second replicate does not even get close to the original dior which is simply a marvalous creation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaston</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialdiva.com/2009/0224/miley-cyrus-zuhair-murad-spring-2009-dress-a-ripoff/comment-page-1/#comment-11177</link>
		<dc:creator>gaston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialdiva.com/?p=5562#comment-11177</guid>
		<description>sense fahion cant be copyrighted whatsoever because they dont consider it an actual art sense its clothing now they are some penalties Chambre de commerce et d&#039;industrie in paris but idkif this would cualify obiously not. but yeah its a very similar sort of replicate of this dress. but the second replicate does not even get close to the original dior which is simply a marvalous creation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sense fahion cant be copyrighted whatsoever because they dont consider it an actual art sense its clothing now they are some penalties Chambre de commerce et d&#8217;industrie in paris but idkif this would cualify obiously not. but yeah its a very similar sort of replicate of this dress. but the second replicate does not even get close to the original dior which is simply a marvalous creation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

